Seven Years of ESL in South Korea

In April 2001 South Korea was a newly liberated country from both military dictatorships and the Asian economic melt down. The population was still blinking out of a decades old tunnel. Their new President was a Harvard Professor, himself a survivor of torture from the South Korean army.

I arrived in South Korea with that most despised personal document, a B.A. degree. Overnight I was Mr. Western Superior World. The Korean notion of an English speaking College degree was about a hundred years out of date. I was instantly recognized really by every Korean as an expert on the path to riches and the Western lifestyle. I had no intention of putting them right. A bus driver took me on a detour on his bus so I could get to my classes on time. Policemen spent the night searching for my lost apartment.

Getting to teaching hagwons in South Korea was mind bogglingly easy. Within about a week I was whisked away from Auckland on a hagwon paid air ticket to Seoul. The only legal requirements were a passport and my original degree certificate.
 
Seven years on, teaching in South Korea may be closer in practice to North Korea. From the easiest ESL requirements in the world they are now arguably the hardest. The New Zealand Immigration Department now has a special section devoted exclusively to ESL in South Korea. This time I had to wait two months to gather the required documents. ESL teachers world wide are now bitterly complaining about the quite outrageous demands now put on them by the South Koreans. I was told that the new ESL regulations have required teachers to fly back to their countries in order to have a five minute interview with the Korean Consulates. An historic trivial Court offense puts teachers into mental agony. I myself was only saved from that because of the New Zealand Court Privacy Act. The new required HIV medical tests are not ever a pleasant experience. The South Koreans in turn complain that they have been serially conned and ripped off by dishonest ESL teachers. The love affair between ESL and South Korea has ended in much bitterness.

The South Koreans had for a long time a very unrealistic understanding of the road to fluency in English. Just stick a degreed westerner in front of their children and English would take flight. South Korean society uses hagwons as both evening baby sitters and English teachers. Parents have wizened up. Unfortunately most parents listen to the judgments of their children and for practical reason don't pay attention to the ESL teachers. If their children are not happy in their hagwon, they typically move their child to another hagwon or lay an ultimatum that sack the ESL teacher or they leave. The children want fun i.e. variants of Sesame Street. Surveys have shown that Sesame Street is a great entertainment but fails to teach. So the ESL teachers are reduced to slave laborers. One might argue that is the free market and the best ESL teachers will survive. Another way of looking at it is teaching is not a commodity. The best teachers are not generally liked by children. Children appreciate them only in later life. The typical Korean child has no interests outside Play Station.  Time spent in the hagwons is to rag the funny looking and sometimes smelling ESL teacher. If the ESL teacher succeeds in subduing them and making them study, just complain to the hagwon and the parents and in a week the ESL teacher is gone. There are some delightful Korean students. There are also excellent ESL teachers still in South Korea. They survive because they are so good and dedicated.
 
However my advice is this. If you treat ESL teaching as offering the Korean students a fun and happy time, ESL is for you in South Korea. However if you have a passion for education, if your personal satisfaction is an hour of progress in English for children, then a long term successful career in ESL in South Korea is not for you. You will be teaching children whose reading matter if it exists at all is centered on Harry Potter. Harry Potter is a magician who just floats all his problems out the window.
 
ESL teachers have achieved slow but real progress in South Korea since 2001. I especially noticed the improvement in English pronunciation. My gut feeling is ESL will now be all regression. The ESL teachers will assume more and more the role of social workers. The ethos of social work is already permeating the South Korean classrooms. Inter school language competitions are held where the children declaim their rights. They can not be hit or even spoken to sarcastically. That is all very nice. They are entitled to hit and humiliate us of course. I succeeded in a very un PC way in stopping a Korean child from chronically masturbating on the table and chairs. I did it by shouting at her. Later I heard it advocated that her father should be investigated. South Korean parents mostly laugh off and ignore their children's misdemeanors. Then they will unpredictably lash out at them. Another seven years on in 2015 I think Kim will not be able to read English or Korean for that matter.

The new South Korean President has high ambitions for the future of ESL. I suggest he and his cronies are totally out of touch with conditions of ESL and general living conditions in South Korea. The political system thinks it can solve ESL problems on the back of an envelope. We are not consulted and as guest workers need not expect any mercy. Recent wild events in the South Korean Parliament show the symptoms of a disintegrating society. I fear the generals will take over. In that case ESL teachers will be made grilled meat. Think of Thailand.

This is a sour and disillusioned opinion from an ex-seven year teaching ESL teacher from South Korea.

Goethe

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments

  • 2/15/2009 Tom Thrien wrote:
    Although, perhaps a bit on the bitter side, the writer does address some of the concerns that face ESL teachers in Korea. There are of course many more aspects of the problems and the joys of working in the Korean educational system both public and private. Not a bad start though.
    Reply to this
  • 2/15/2009 Matt wrote:
    I fail to see why this piece was published. Do the editors of ESL Daily bother to read the articles they upload on their website? It's nothing but a poorly written list of increasingly off-the-wall assertions. In other words, it's a rant and should have gone no further than the pub where it probably originated. It doesn't so much address concerns as raise them: concerns about the type of teacher the writer is, and, by association, other ESL teachers in Korea.

    My message to the writer: please stop making us look bad! My message to ESL Daily: please don't post up any old person's rantings as if that person had the right to represent all ESL teachers.
    Reply to this
    1. 2/16/2009 ESL Daily wrote:
      Matt

      I am sorry you feel this way about this man's story.  Remember, ESL Daily is not a massive news paper with writers knocking on the door begging to be published.  Granted, a large portion is a rant, and I try to keep ESL Daily on the factual end of things.  But it is always nice to shake things up with peoples experiences and stories.  I know my personal writing skill is generally dry and boring, to the point (quite often grammatically incorrect as many point out).  If you want to know what pieces have actually been written by me (Jim), just look for the articles that put you to sleep.

      I am not commenting to argue for or against you Matt, and do not take anything personally.  I would love to hear more experiences from you or anyone else.  Teaching tips, stories, events or news.

      Reply to this
    2. 2/16/2009 Eunji wrote:
      While I do agree that the piece was on the negative side, I really take offense to your comment 'please don't post up any old person's rantings as if that person had the right to represent all ESL teachers.' Does the fact that he has been teaching here for seven years make him an 'old person?' And what if he was? Are you discriminating against older teachers? I am an 'older person' who has been successfully teaching here for over 3 years. During that time I have heard plenty of rants, worse than the above, from young people barely over twenty. That said, how old are you? Your ignorant comment is no better than the original posting.
      Reply to this
  • 3/1/2009 A Teacher wrote:
    Although there were some grammar errors in the post, many of the arguments seem quite true--but not only of South Korea. Private language teaching is increasingly being used as a "baby-sitter" by parents cramped in tiny condominiums and with too much on their minds.

    Students demand entertainment. Unfortunately, learning isn't always fun. As soon as possible I am leaving private schools and heading to a properly regulated government institution.

    So it goes.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.